reebok aztrek

注册时间: 28/05/2020 03:40:29 文章: 3 离线

I won't buy Asics reebok classic shoes because I feel that Asics is maintaining the status quo (e.g., lots of cushioning, pronation control devices) and, in my opinion, maintaining the status quo seems to be directly at odds with the idea of progressive development. Simon- you are very right about a study not being out there. We who coined the term Zero Drop' (Altra Footwear) feel like more research should be done on this. I totally agree with you that this is nearly impossible though. Like you said: "Many in these blogs have demanded a study proving conventional fotwear reduces injury rates. Well you sound like a guy with a scientific background, so maybe you can explain to the punters on this blog just how dificult it would be, if not impossible to design a meaningful study to ask that scientific question.

Why would a running shoe company want to avoid making money from this market? If ASICS isn't careful, they might become the IBM of running shoes. So, after reading the comments of Simon Bartold I am adding this brand to the increasing list of shoe brands I will never buy. Thanks for the awesome post Pete. Once again you have put forth a well thought out and supported rebuttal reebok shoes to an extremely biased comment made by another "the world is square!" shoe company leader. It continues to amaze me that a shoe company would allow an employee of theirs to alienate an entire group of consumers. Wow. By the way Simon, since you're calling for evidence, where is your evidence that the high-heeled, high-cushioned, highly "supportive" shoes you are pushing prevent injury or even help the runner in any way?

And the argument reebok the pump that "if it ain't broke& " doesn't hold any weight since there aren't any studies that today's platformed heel running shoe prevent injuries in any way. I'm thinking that the only thing those shoes are good for is to help prevent heel fractures when heel-striking. Just one runners opinion. Not that consumer opinion counts, right Simon? Oh, and even if you weren't supposedly speaking for Asics, if you represent yourself as an Asics researcher then, to the minds of the audience, you are speaking for Asics. Sorry, but its true. Great post Pete. I can't help but be annoyed at the belligerence of Bartold. Whenever I approach debates like that I always like to look back at history. It provides great insights into how and why we developed our unique physiology.

Either way- I took two months off of running (that killed reebok shoes for men me) and when I finally did dare run, on went the ASICS. I'd comfortable run a marathon in 2150's last September, so they were my go-to's. 0.75 miles and I was done. The pain was still there and I was miffed to high heaven. furious even. I could feel that something in the shoe was changing my gait and foot strike in a way that my body didn't want to move. So I closeted my Brooks and ASICS and dusted off my Kinvaras. Another week off and I went out for a comfortable (but slow) 12 mile run on even terrain. No pain. That was 15 days ago. I've since run some 51 miles and while some runs have been uncomfortable, my last- yesterday, was a 13.1 miler that was completely pain free in any area that had previously bothered me.

Actually, I think all he's doing, along with every other shoe company representative that belittles minimalist runners/advocates/converts, is alienate a rapidly growing segment of the running population. Will this group of runners be more or less likely to purchase a pair of Asics running shoes after reading his polarizing comments? I'm not trying to be a jerk, I'm just asking an honest question. I've been running in ASICS GT 2150 since about Jan 1. In that time I've gone from running 30 seconds and then walking, to running 13-15 miles comfortably. To be honest, I bought the 2150s because the sporting goods store had them in a EEEE width, and knowing that my forefoot tends to splay and expand a lot on impact, I always go with a shoe wider than my foot measures. (Never one blister for me in the 2150).

Asics must be concerned about the minimalist movement if they send their big?chief?Bartold to argue with people who do not need proof about their running style. Why else would Bartold be looking at reebok aztrek websites calledZero Drop'? I run minimal because it works for me. We do not need to sell a product like Asics does. I do not?believe?that the water shoe manufacturer thought about my 15 mile jaunts while designing them. Therefore, Bartold's presence on this site and Zero Drop' should be taken as a compliment my minimal runners that the major shoe manufacturers take us a serious threat to their philosophy: a clear win. A reader on Zero Drop' asks Bartold why he can run barefoot with his?double axes neurological vertigo but

cannot take a step in Asics without falling over.